www.bewet.fora.pl

loczytzn

Essay compiled ter XVI: men and women, but a man of emotion: wild Anthology

Essay compiled ter XVI: men and women who are nothing but feelings of
??????????????????Study: Selected Works wild
????????????????? Original starting in 2009-01-15?? Popularity: 4872 Amidst the literary prose site, we wrote a text-ching, \
Man-ching style of writing, nature is beyond reproach: the article is very exciting!
And I, her article left a message: the text does the theory of National Tsing Hua University more clever than tobacco smoke, but some small problems. Liu Bei said, I do not agree with one, I believe the majority will not agree, naturally, a big \Take the words of Liu Bei as a section of the extended end of the article, if defective, because he was not a philosopher, not a saint, but not the logician. The big \As for \In fact, the form and female metaphor to describe it, do not have to use the \Women like to say, ancient times, but we all know that women are not, just as this argument may not necessarily correct cylinder the same. In other words, any use out of context the way, just use the logic of form and technique and a metaphor and women to want to put a thorough approach, in my opinion, are futile. The reason is very simple, because that is,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], women are women. At this point, I think: For and women, of any resolution for the imagery and are white laborious exercise in futility. But back to look at the article it is really wonderful big, strong and more than tobacco smoke.
Feeling clothes controversy, yesterday I also wrote an article entitled \deliberately written in a very funny, and my aim, in the hope that readers from this absurd theory funny shoes, clothes see the logic of sophistry. National Tsing Hua University
paper also lonely, and in order to win this debate for the victory of women, with exquisite writing technique, \
Although the text of National Tsing Hua University in fact made a peacemaker, stood in the centrist, but in the end it, but stressed such as clothes on, naturally, echoed from the side, Ms. Shen Q, such as smoke on clothes.
I want to say, beating, female worth mentioning, are nothing but a sense of the!
flu deducted if the harmony, and the logic used to emphasize shape and clothes on, if it is too formalism it?
starting from the flu, my point is: female, not clothes, nor shoes, nor anything else, and the nature of woman, are nothing but are thinking but there is only felt in the higher animals , it just so it.
come on from the flu, then the clothes on to look so insignificant, it seemed so dry and no weight.
to want as both ladies clothes, want a life as an object to use, the vast majority of life, certainly in psychology will not accept.
because only when a depth of a woman, he would be willing to go as the heart, such as woman clothing, printing machines, Guinness, cooking machine,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and so a number of props in a variety of angles of life. Once a not a woman, then this woman all the delusions, but also are Nankeyimeng, not to mention give you a corner as clothes, I'm afraid you are terribly in the summer time, even if his knees and begged him to let him buy you a root may be impossible and ice. So, in the end what angle, not by the women have the final say, in fact, often by a sense of the determined woman. In the absence of a sense of context and, in the absence of the premise of mutual respect for each other, no matter how a woman would like to have to go as the car, such as clothes, props, and so life angle, and its reverse are also subjective wishes are crazy, but that dream.
Conversely, the same woman, they should not count on women like clothes. When a woman is not a time for all metaphor for the woman, but also basic is wrong. If the correct theory, such as clothing, if it is true, then women like shoes, which is nothing inconsistent. That is absurd, such as clothes, the sophistry of a theory on why women like shoes is ridiculous.
and between, care about nothing more than a word. The premise without any metaphor, are only willing to say that eight of a car.
and clothes can not be analog, as you can easily buy clothes, but not the heart that you will be able to catch the hand, came over and said, women are the same. Shoes can easily buy, with broken, you can easily throw,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but the other half of the marriage, but can not be treated casually.
The reason I asked the President to be critical, such as Shen smoke on clothes, such as clothes and culture of National Tsing Hua University, is that I think they have desecrated the most valuable class a sense among women.
Wen-ching article to writing, the true literarily, but she did not really prove her argument is correct.
set aside the issues and a sense among women, and between the Mu problems, just shaped and the use of sophistry to try to prove who is the clothes and women who are discussing ways of shoes, I am afraid that belong to passive The argument that without trees only.
saying goes, \
sense of depth between women, often determines their life scheduling between the various angles. Is not your clothes, will have to see that is not very you. If he does not you, then you have him, that is an extra daughter. At this time, the first not mention clothes, as long as you can make him invisible hiding place, even if you accumulate virtue of the.
came over and said, too, women on the run, is that your clothes, they have to see if she was you.
So I think that any plan to use metaphors to describe the bias and women and marriage in the female angle problems are one-sided, are shaped and the.
clothes on the nature, there is a sense of their sound is so mean and no. To the feeling is: get a sense of when the consumer goods, to take marriage lightly, take the dignity of other cells when the ball!
I wrote \Thinking about how I will not get the logic is derived from the clothes of Ms. Shen asked of smoke it? I know I write so very funny, this can be funny how no shoes on through to the fallacy of thinking of what clothes?
And to prove the right clothes on and great, echoed Ms. Shen Wenqing smoke ask a lady her practice, do not they write, \
I write this, is going to tear down the clothes on.
I want to emphasize is this: in the sense of the problem is not resolved, anyone who is not the clothes, no one who's shoes.
and if, one by one the two women, in a sense has been very harmonious, or has entered the marriage, or has been going to the old white, then, between you, who like to do each other's clothes Ye Hao , shoes worth mentioning, are also things between you. The secret of this matter between husband and wife with the other do not have any relationship. So, when you think your other half is the time of your clothes, then in your article you state clearly the title of your husband as your clothes this.
Only in this way, do not make the most of anger and injustice.
Ms. Ye Hao Wen Qing, Shen asked Ms. smoke matter whether they regard the expansion of the problem. Wen-ching
If only that her husband is her clothes, then those of us outside, nature is nothing to say, it is beyond reproach. But Wen-ching says, \So I want to ask me: I was, I am your clothes? Jintao also, he is also your clothes? If you say that he and I are not your clothes, then he and I in the end who's clothes?
Jintao at least I have not heard her husband say: Jintao is my clothes. Have never heard my wife said to me: you are my clothes.
the same time I also believe that this world, women have been married so many women are estimated to have not to be so many couples do not respect each other. I have never heard how many such women married to evaluate each other.
and if, asked Ms. Shen Wen-ching smoke, are a denial of their husband or future husband, not their clothes, then clothes they like to boast of, in the end is that listening to whom?
so we can assume is this: Man-ching's husband, not her clothes, Shen smoke ask future husband, not her clothes. It can be used as their clothes, is not the kind of husband in addition to their other than it?
If I leave the establishment, then the two ladies in the fact, not only in terms of serious abnormal cells, in the spirit must have been wrong. I only hope now is this: I hope my assumption is wrong.
So I'd like to ask Ms. Shen Wen Qing women smoking be raised by a suggestion: clothes on, please limit your own husband can, and must not expand the open. Because, you were the point of view, not suitable for women of all female world, but not suitable for the majority of living things on the sense and understanding of patterns of marriage.
In my opinion, regardless of women, its nature is, above all, felt each other out, that is, marriage, or among. In between the two, regardless of how they chirp Wo Wo, and also with other unrelated. Then, two to go \Therefore,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the clothes on, there is limited, expansion into the world and open to women, to trying to demonstrate the correct way of clothes, it is absurd sophistry. Wen Qing
great literary talent, but she enlarged a marriage of her feelings and experiences of life in the practice, in principle, is guilty of the logical form of the error. It is like the current Agriculture, Learn,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], industrial school in Daqing, so exaggerating jin per mu, as are similar to the sophistry of logic.

2009 年 1 月 15

mountain lay Appendix the text of Wen-ching at [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]