Forum www.bewet.fora.pl Strona Główna www.bewet.fora.pl
Wszystko o zwierzętach.
 
 FAQFAQ   SzukajSzukaj   UżytkownicyUżytkownicy   GrupyGrupy   GalerieGalerie   RejestracjaRejestracja 
 ProfilProfil   Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomościZaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości   ZalogujZaloguj 

ugg prezzo Horizontal freezer evaporator layout im

 
Napisz nowy temat   Odpowiedz do tematu    Forum www.bewet.fora.pl Strona Główna -> Informacje i opinie.
Zobacz poprzedni temat :: Zobacz następny temat  
Autor Wiadomość
loczytzn




Dołączył: 30 Sie 2010
Posty: 1563
Przeczytał: 0 tematów

Ostrzeżeń: 0/5
Skąd: qbmmss

PostWysłany: Pon 19:51, 20 Gru 2010    Temat postu: ugg prezzo Horizontal freezer evaporator layout im

Horizontal freezer evaporator layout improvements


When the temperature refused to load food comparison (C) the maximum temperature of food highly 0l/2H2/3H lowest minimum value of the world put the highest rate volatility increases the maximum value of the minimum value of the crossing of a l9.71.1-17.2 1-18.6 -1 Kai. 71.5 an l8-19.11.32-19.3-2l11.8-17.8 a l9.61.8-186-2O. 15 test 3-19.4-21.31.9-180-2O. O2. O a l8.9-2056 of a 2O12.0 point 4-19.2-21.11.9 a l8.219008 a l8.1 Code 5-19.1-20.91.8 a l79 - 1992.0 -18.6-19.6l0 No. 6, a l86 - 20.41.8 a l7.4 - 19.31.9-17.3-1780.57-18.4-2O. 21.8-17.4 - 19.11.7 - 16.5 a l720.7 maximum amplitude of 1.92. Ol_6 maximum temperature 101.60.91.42.433 distribution compared to the overall load in the temperature of food after the rejection level increased,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but the temperature of the measuring point decline in volatility. Food loaded with the H 2/3H height of each point when the maximum temperature fluctuations were 1.6c,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], 14 ℃. Much lower than the no load 40c, shown in Table 4. Figure 5 (a), (b) shows the cooling thermostat setting position 2, refusal to \. Table 5 shows the 2-load and load refrigerator foods of different heights inside the measuring point of the maximum and minimum temperature and the corresponding volatility. And ring 3 (c) 2 are given the cold rejection temperature distribution in no-load rejection compared with rejection after loading food temperature levels within the overall rise. Place food and no-load height l/2H compared to Table 6 of the measuring points 1 and Ling refused to counter the cold load of food height 2/3H 2 when the temperature refused to compare (Cj down counter No. 2 chip temperature freezer cabinet fart 1 lowest volatility of high-value low level maximum amplitude of a deletion of point number two 17 l9.11.3 ~ 20】 l5 ~ 2O.l6 ~ 19.rO.8-15. a 16.E0.9 ~ 19.f1.0 -16.E a 18.1.6 a 17 .-- 19.21.54-l9.4-2081.4-2114-21.g1.4-20.g a 22.3I.4 ~ 17.E0 .5 ... 21C - 22.414 ~ 17 ? 07 so the maximum temperature difference between the wrinkle amplitude 1.61.6 5.35.82.43.360 fluid machinery t (min) (・) Food height 2t3H (b) a high degree of food Shu 1 lap 4 carry load distribution of food after the machine level and the temperature fluctuations of the temperature difference between measuring points is not the greatest; and when the food when the load height is 2/3H. the bottom of the food placed within the space of temperature measuring point volatility significantly reduced when compared with no-load, see Table 5. Table 6 shows the freezer and refrigerator 2 1 loading height is 213lt food when comparing the temperature distribution inside. we can see from Table 6: For the refrigerator 1, the lowest temperature at the bottom, top {and for the Ministry of the highest temperature freezer 2, the lowest temperature in the middle of the temperature measuring point 3, the bottom temperature is high; freezer l placed at the bottom of the food in the air with the temperature below the measuring point 2, two freezer refrigerator temperature of each point the maximum fluctuation the same, 1.6C, but foodstuffs placed on the lower part of refrigerator 2, the space fluctuations of the magnitude of the temperature measuring point l smaller than the freezer. freezers inside the measuring point 2,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the maximum temperature difference of 3.3 'C, The refrigerator 1 was 5.8 \Figure 5 2 installed cabinet refused to just after the Tau ☆ temperature distribution of goods 4 Conclusions and recommendations (1) horizontal cold evaporator from the top and bottom are refusing to set towel up city layout,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the maximum temperature inside the measuring point and the maximum fluctuation significantly reduced; loading height of 213 foods, improved large temperature difference within the EU also decreased the temperature distribution inside look to improve land grumble. (2) the improved thermostat settings in three locations (the weak, the strong) under The average temperature inside the same, and loaded foods improved the overall temperature inside rose slightly higher than before modification. (3) improving the low temperature before the refusal of caries at the giant dry bottom Bian,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the highest temperature in the cabinet department, the improved cabinet to the lowest Department of temperature in the box ¨ jt, high temperature in the cabinet bottom. _ plate evaporator proposed new design layout can be lower in the upper part of clouds loose a new form of rain, the temperature distribution in order to facilitate uniform distribution of refusal '.

相关的主题文章:


[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]


Post został pochwalony 0 razy
Powrót do góry
Zobacz profil autora
Wyświetl posty z ostatnich:   
Napisz nowy temat   Odpowiedz do tematu    Forum www.bewet.fora.pl Strona Główna -> Informacje i opinie. Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1

 
Skocz do:  
Nie możesz pisać nowych tematów
Nie możesz odpowiadać w tematach
Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów
Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów
Nie możesz głosować w ankietach

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin