www.bewet.fora.pl

kenyarichieh

The ads do not make any claims of reduced health risks with a potential switch. Some anti-smoking advocates are encouraging the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to allow the advertising of smokeless tobacco as less harmful than cigarettes if such claims can be proven through research.,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych][link widoczny dla zalogowanych]. For example, a study of smokers ages 18 to 70 ― released in November by the Tobacco Use Research Center of the University of Minnesota ― found that “quit rates for Camel Snus were comparable to those obtained with nicotine replacement therapy.”
“A properly powered study is needed to determine if use of smokeless tobacco products with higher nicotine content can be an effective path to smoking cessation, perhaps especially among smokers who are not interested in or previously were not successful with using approved pharmaco therapies.” Some anti-tobacco advocates oppose marketing smokeless products under cigarettes’ brand names because of those brands’ appeal to youth. The 2010 Monitoring the Future survey, released Dec. 14, found that smokeless tobacco use is rising among eighth, 10th and 12th graders, including at 16 percent among 12th-grade boys.
The survey is conducted by the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]. Michigan researchers said that factors leading to the increases in smokeless-tobacco use likely included increased advertising and availability of these products. Myers said that research of smokeless products must evaluate what harm is caused by the product along with how the product is marketed. “If a smokeless product reduces the risk of disease, but results in more people using tobacco, it could result in more deaths,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], not fewer,” Myers said.
Godshall said it will be interesting to see if the FDA tries to claim “that Reynolds’ new ads make Camel Snus an unapproved smoking-cessation drug device.” He said that the FDA has made such a claim with electronic cigarettes. Indeed, a study published this past fall in the journal Psychopharmacology, titled “Tolerance and cross-tolerance to neurocognitive effects of THC and alcohol in heavy cannabis users,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],” reported: “In conclusion, the present study generally confirms that heavy cannabis users develop tolerance to the impairing effects of THC on neurocognitive task performance.
Yet, heavy cannabis users did not develop cross-tolerance to the impairing effects of alcohol, and the presence of the latter even selectively potentiated THC effects on measures of divided attention.cheap newport cigarettes.” Basically,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], they found that while drivers who smoked marijuana did not perform that badly on driving tests, adding alcohol to the mix was really bad. Nobody is saying that it’s OK to drive while impaired by marijuana. However, when compared to alcohol use, the harms were much less. Or as Abel puts it, “marijuana is way safer than alcohol.”