www.bewet.fora.pl
Wszystko o zwierzętach.
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Profil
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj
Forum www.bewet.fora.pl Strona Główna
->
Zwierzaki w potrzebie
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
NIE
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Sklep
----------------
Informacje i opinie.
Promocje.
Konkursy.
Pomoc dla zwierząt
----------------
Zwierzaki w potrzebie
Bewet pomaga
Żywienie,higiena,zdrowie.
----------------
Żywienie, higiena, zdrowie.
Artykuły dla zwierząt.
----------------
Artykuły dla zwierząt.
Nasi ulubieńcy.
----------------
Nasi ulubieńcy.
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
uj0ydd9ozzx
Wysłany: Nie 11:22, 22 Maj 2011
Temat postu: Ghostcrawler and the hybrid tax
Ghostcrawler has put a significant sticky up on the forums about what he calls the
buy wow gold
"hybrid tax" in terms of PvE play -- there's been some back and forth lately on the forums about hybrid wow gold classes and what they should and shouldn't be able to do,
aion kinah
, and GC wants to put any confusion about what Blizzard intends "hybrids" to be to rest. Very basically, he says that there are three roles in the game (tanking, healing, and DPS), and if a class can respec to perform a different role, it's considered a hybrid class. Otherwise, it's a "pure" class. This means a few things: pure classes, world of warcraft gold he says, should have slightly higher DPS ("all things being equal," and when does that ever happen?), because they don't have the option to switch out. There's no rule as to how much better that is, but as a tradeoff of rerolling being the only way for "pures" to switch, they get to be a little better. That's the "hybrid tax," and mages, hunters, rogues, and warlocks don't have to pay it.
Hybrids, however, do, and that means that paladins, druids, priests, shamans, and to a certain extent,
cheapest aion kinah
, warriors and death knights, will in Blizzard's view never be able to equal "pure" classes in terms of DPS output, with everything else being equal. You may love your ret pally, and he may be in uber gear, but he should never be able to pour out as much damage as an equally specced and geared hunter, because you can switch to healing, and the hunter can't.
Is that wrong? Not at all -- it may disappoint some people (and Ghostcrawler probably knows, but we'll remind him anyway that posting even this clearly on the forums won't put a lot of complaints to rest), and it may cause some rerolls, but it definitely makes sense. Flexibility is an asset, and not having that flexibility in a pure class does mean that they should get out of paying that tax. If you only do one thing, you should be able to do it better than someone who has the option to do all three. And as he says, what you want to do with the class has nothing to do with how Blizzard is balancing them overall. It doesn't matter if all you wanted to do when you rolled that priest was play shadow -- they need to be balanced as hybrids.
GC says that Blizzard has played around with roles in the past,
buy aion gold
, but going forward, this is the philosophy: if you're playing a hybrid class, you'll never be able to fulfill a role as well as if you were playing the "pure" class meant to serve that role.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin